Last Friday at around 8PM when I saw
this post on IFB about "Bloggers & Body Image" pop up on my Facebook timeline (c/o of
Kelly from Masque Mag), I winced and clicked, hoping for the best but dreading the worst. Based on just the Facebook comments, I knew it was going to be a controversial article before even opening it. As an overview, the premise of the article is to examine and provide commentary on the plight of non-traditional or niche fashion bloggers. The opinions expressed hinted at the idea that the most successful fashion bloggers are not just successful because they fit within the fashion industry's ideals (non-minority/young/skinny/modelesque/all of the above) but that they're also successful because their blogs just have better quality overall. They have discipline, they post higher quality images and they post more consistently.
 |
| Gabi Gregg & Myself |
Within the plus-size blogging community, for example, the author essentially argued that aside from bloggers like
Gabi Gregg and
Nicolette Mason (both of whom I love to pieces, by the way) there aren't enough high quality bloggers with curves or other non-traditional qualities for brands to take notice of anyway. After reading it at least three times and combing through some of the commentary surrounding the issue, I proceeded to write an honest and emotional response. I poured out my heart in the comments section. And almost immediately after writing it, I erased it.
As someone who has been very vocal about my issue with body image and the role it plays in social promotion within the fashion industry - both online and offline (if you haven't yet, please read my
Why Don't You Love Me: An Ode To Outfit Posts article), it would only seem natural for me to have an immediate and honest response to this issue. I saw fellow bloggers like Marie Denee of
The Curvy Fashionista, jump in with poignant critique in the comments section. I saw offshoot posts
in defense of quality bloggers with curves over at Shamepuff. Up until today, I've even seen video responses from bloggers like
Comme Coco voicing their opinions and frustrations. Still I refused to respond. I've kept quiet for the past few days, not because I was scared or "over it", or because I have any allegiances to IFB (though I am an
occasional contributor for them and I do really enjoy it), but because I didn't think voicing my opinion would even make a difference. Sad, right? Sad that I'm at the awkward intersection of frustration and nonchalance with this industry, so much that I don't think my commentary or even writing this post your reading right now, matters in the grand scheme.
This past weekend, I was interviewed by a publication about my opinions on the plight of minority fashion hopefuls and our lack of representation in the industry. I was open and honest in my dialogue about it. Over and over, I keep seeing and hearing these themes about the lack of diversity in fashion and the inherent void it leaves in the hearts of talented people who never really get a chance because they're not enough. Never enough.
 |
| Estee Lauder spokesbeauties: Joan Smalls, Constance Jablonski, Liu Wen |
From the time I decided I wanted to pursue a career in the fashion industry, I've been faced with some hard, grim and painful realities. In my attempt to make my personal dreams come true, I've been slapped in the face with the truth about what it takes to make it to the height of true success - not just in the digital realm but within the industry as a whole. I've seen fashion/beauty editor friends who can't advance any further in their careers at mainstream publications because of glass ceilings, and so they're essentially forced to work for more "diverse" publications in order to be promoted and appreciated. I've seen bloggers with all the potential in the world, the most amazing style, and personalities to boot consistently overlooked by the very brands they promote on a daily basis. I've seen interns passed over for full-time opportunities because they weren't the right "fit". I've seen stylists with immense talent and drive and creativity, relegated to working on projects that never see the light of day. It's been a real cup of reali-tea for me.
Refinery 29 recently released an article
"Obviously People Judge Your Picture Online..." citing an infographic from
HSN Beauty about the correlation between beauty, images and social promotion. The results weren't surprising. The resounding theme includes the idea that people who are pretty or have more compelling images are more likely to get jobs, brand opportunities, endorsements, and be "liked" or "searched for" overall. Seeing this put quite a few ideas in perspective for me.
Coming from a background of nurturing and encouragement, and growing up in a household where I was told I could do anything I put my mind to, this environment came as a shocker. Nobody told me that I couldn't open doors for myself. That someone else had to open them for me. And that perfect proportions or straight hair would open the doors much wider, so that I could actually fit into their narrow openings. And the older and wiser I get, the more I begin to question if my opinion really matters when things are so slow to change. Like a tree falling in an empty forest, if nobody hears these cries, do they really exist? You decide.
I want your opinion. Is there an eternal cap on success for non-traiditonal beauties attempting to work in this industry? If my hair isn't stick straight and neither is my body, am I eternally doomed to being ignored by major labels and being offered opportunities? Furthermore, is it even worth taking about?
